Eric Faulkner
Managing Partner Mid-Atlantic | Fractional CTO, Fractional CIO
Picture this scenario: You’ve just had a call with a potential fractional CTO candidate — let’s call him Mike. Mike’s LinkedIn profile (like so many) reads like an impressive highlight reel. There are logos from well-known companies, a string of senior titles, glowing endorsements from tons of accomplished people in major roles. He spoke fluently about cloud architecture, agile methodology, and scalable systems.
Overall, Mike seemed very sharp, confident, and exactly the fractional CTO you’ve been looking for. The problem is, as a non-technical founder you may not know what the right questions to ask actually are.
That’s critical, because there’s a real chance that the person you just interviewed is what we call an “accidental fractional.” Someone who’s a smart technologist, but between full-time jobs and taking on a gig or two while they figure out their next move. In six months, when the right offer lands in their inbox, they’ll be winding down your engagement and you’ll be back to square one.
This is especially true now that the fractional CTO market has exploded. Which is mostly a good thing, since it means founders at every stage can access senior technology leadership without the cost of a full-time C-suite hire. But with that growth comes clutter, and for a non-technical founder, it can be hard to separate a true experienced fractional CTO from someone new to the category who will be learning on your dime.
What follows is a “how to” that aims to give you a vetting framework to find a true fractional CTO. Not through deciphering technical jargon, but by asking the right business questions, exploring the right areas, and having a clear idea of what good answers should actually sound like.
That’s a big difference that matters a lot in the fractional CTO market. For instance, a senior IT engineer or VP of Engineering with experience in larger firms who’s having trouble landing their next role can rebrand as a fractional, pick up one or two clients through their network, and suddenly have a respectable-looking practice (what’s known as a “single shingle”). They may be excellent technically, but if they’ve never actually been in the CTO seat — reported to the CEO and owned the full scope of technology leadership — that’s an awful lot to try and figure out on your time and your budget.
What to look for: Check their LinkedIn and résumé specifically for CTO or equivalent C-level titles at companies of similar size and stage to yours. A VP of Engineering at a 1,000-person firm is very different from a CTO who’s built and run a technology organization from scratch at a Series A startup. Both have value, but not necessarily the value you need.
The question to ask: “Walk me through a time when you owned the full technology function at a company, not just the development team. What did that scope include, and what were the hardest parts?” A true CTO will have immediate, concrete, and expansive answers that go well beyond just technical stuff.
There’s no shortage of technology executives who are genuinely brilliant at what they do, but have little focus on how technology should be serving the ultimate business objectives. They get excited about architecture and new frameworks. What they should be asking is: “How does this impact revenue results?” or “Does it reduce risk in a way that’s meaningful to the business?” For a non-technical founder, a CTO who cannot translate technology decisions into business outcomes is less like a real executive partner and more like a contractor.
Use the P&L litmus test. One strong sign of business acumen is whether a fractional CTO candidate has had meaningful P&L oversight during their career. P&L responsibility isn’t necessarily difficult, but it’s an important indicator of whether a candidate understands that technology decisions have financial consequences.
The question to ask: “Can you give me an example of how you think about making technology investment decisions when resources are limited?” The answer you want is framed in terms of business outcomes — speed-to-market, customer retention, and fundraising readiness. The order in which they prioritize these tells you a lot.
If you find yourself feeling confused or unable to follow the thread of their answers during the interview, that could be less a reflection of your technical knowledge than a red flag about their communication skills. Which brings us to…
One of the most underrated capabilities of a strong fractional CTO is the ability to make complex technical concepts accessible to non-technical stakeholders — including founders, boards, investors, and leadership teams who need to make decisions without becoming engineers themselves. Many technologists never develop this “translation” skill. They default to jargon, talk in circles, or answer a simple question with a 10-minute explanation of the underlying architecture.
What good looks like: By the end of your first conversation with a strong fractional CTO candidate, you should feel more informed, not more confused. You should be able to describe in plain language at least two or three things you learned about your own technology situation that you didn’t know before. If you leave a conversation thinking “I think they were impressive but I’m not sure what they actually said,” that instinct is telling you something.
The question to ask: “Explain technical debt to me like I’m making a business decision about whether to address it.” Their answer should be a business case, not a technical lecture. Bonus points if they naturally connect it to a risk or opportunity specific to your company.
If your company has VC or PE backing, or if you’re actively pursuing investment, your fractional CTO will almost certainly need to know investor dynamics. They should know how to navigate investor relationships, prepare for technical due diligence, and understand how to position your technology story to people who have seen hundreds of decks and have a very particular set of expectations. This is something that can only be mastered by going through the process multiple times.
M&A experience is also a plus. Even smaller companies in the sub-$25M revenue range are not immune to acquisition activity. A fractional CTO who has been through the buy-side or sell-side diligence process brings a set of skills that are incredibly valuable — and can’t easily be learned on the fly.
The question to ask: “Have you been through a technical due diligence process, either as part of a buying or selling process? What surprised you the most? What were you most and least prepared for?” If the answer to the first question is “no,” that may not necessarily mean disqualification — but it is a gap worth weighing carefully.
This is a question many founders don’t know to ask. By now, “fractional” has become a legitimate career path with real traction in the market. Unfortunately, it has also become a convenient label for smart people between jobs who are picking up gigs while they search for what’s next. The distinction matters a lot:
The accidental fractional. An accidental fractional is typically someone who has strong technical credentials and a good network, but who has never deliberately built a fractional practice. They may have one or two clients right now — probably because the opportunities found them, not because they designed a business around serving multiple clients simultaneously. When the right full-time offer comes along, they’ll wind your engagement down.
The career fractional. A career fractional has made a deliberate choice to operate this way. They have a clear view of how many clients they want to carry at any given time, what their ideal engagement structure looks like, and how they manage the demands of multiple founders simultaneously. They’ve built a support network of trusted vendors, relationships with managed service providers, and access to specialized disciplines when needed. The best ones are part of a bigger fractional organization — which means you’re not just engaging a person; you’re hiring an ecosystem.
The questions to ask: “How long have you been operating as a fractional CTO? How many clients are you currently serving, and what does your ideal client mix look like?” Then: “What does your support network look like? If I needed specialized resources or a development partner, how would you approach that?” A career fractional will have clear, practical answers to both.
A strong fractional CTO candidate will almost always propose some kind of structured discovery or assessment period before locking in a long-term engagement structure. This typically runs two to six weeks and serves two purposes: it gives them time to understand your technology, your business, your team, and your real challenges — and it gives you time to evaluate whether you actually work well together.
Be skeptical of anyone who doesn’t want to assess before committing. If a candidate tells you in your first conversation that you’ll need them at 50% time without having looked under the hood, that’s worth questioning. A good fractional CTO will want to earn the right scope rather than assume it.
The question to ask: “How would you structure the first 30 to 60 days of an engagement with us? What would you expect to learn, and what would you deliver at the end of that period?” Listen for specifics. A career fractional should be able to describe their approach clearly, not in general terms.
This is one of the most practical questions a non-technical founder can ask when you’ve hired someone to manage a function you can’t directly evaluate: “How do you know if they’re delivering?”
Tie it to business outcomes from day one. Before the engagement starts, work with your fractional CTO to define what success looks like in terms you understand and can measure. If the problem was product delivery, what are the milestones? If the problem was technical debt, what does “better” look like in six months? Set these metrics and track them like you track other important KPIs.
Look out for the translation test. One practical ongoing sign of fractional CTO effectiveness is whether they are consistently able to brief you, your board, or your investors in plain language about what’s happening on the technology side of the business. If you’re still feeling like an outsider in those conversations after six months, something’s off.
Use these questions in your interviews. You don’t need to understand the nuances of the technical answers — just listen for clarity, business orientation, and honesty.
Remember, a LinkedIn profile is a starting point, not a decision. For a non-technical founder, it can give you some useful background — but it tells you almost nothing about whether someone can actually lead technology in service of your specific business goals, investors, and growth stage.
This is key: to make a great fractional CTO hire you just need to ask business questions, listen for business answers, and pay attention to how clearly someone can operate in your world, not just theirs.
When you find a career fractional CTO with the breadth of experience, business acumen, and communication skills to operate at your side — and not just get buried inside your tech stack — the impact is immediate. Because they know what you need, and they’ve been there before.
Get the latest insights from TechCXO’s fractional executives—strategies, trends, and advice to drive smarter growth.
Picture this scenario: You’ve just had a call with a potential fractional CTO candidate — let’s call him Mike. Mike’s LinkedIn profile (like so many) reads like an impressive highlight reel. There are logos from well-known companies, a string of senior titles, glowing endorsements from tons of accomplished people in major roles. He spoke fluently about cloud architecture, agile methodology, and scalable systems.
Overall, Mike seemed very sharp, confident, and exactly the fractional CTO you’ve been looking for. The problem is, as a non-technical founder you may not know what the right questions to ask actually are.
That’s critical, because there’s a real chance that the person you just interviewed is what we call an “accidental fractional.” Someone who’s a smart technologist, but between full-time jobs and taking on a gig or two while they figure out their next move. In six months, when the right offer lands in their inbox, they’ll be winding down your engagement and you’ll be back to square one.
This is especially true now that the fractional CTO market has exploded. Which is mostly a good thing, since it means founders at every stage can access senior technology leadership without the cost of a full-time C-suite hire. But with that growth comes clutter, and for a non-technical founder, it can be hard to separate a true experienced fractional CTO from someone new to the category who will be learning on your dime.
What follows is a “how to” that aims to give you a vetting framework to find a true fractional CTO. Not through deciphering technical jargon, but by asking the right business questions, exploring the right areas, and having a clear idea of what good answers should actually sound like.
That’s a big difference that matters a lot in the fractional CTO market. For instance, a senior IT engineer or VP of Engineering with experience in larger firms who’s having trouble landing their next role can rebrand as a fractional, pick up one or two clients through their network, and suddenly have a respectable-looking practice (what’s known as a “single shingle”). They may be excellent technically, but if they’ve never actually been in the CTO seat — reported to the CEO and owned the full scope of technology leadership — that’s an awful lot to try and figure out on your time and your budget.
What to look for: Check their LinkedIn and résumé specifically for CTO or equivalent C-level titles at companies of similar size and stage to yours. A VP of Engineering at a 1,000-person firm is very different from a CTO who’s built and run a technology organization from scratch at a Series A startup. Both have value, but not necessarily the value you need.
The question to ask: “Walk me through a time when you owned the full technology function at a company, not just the development team. What did that scope include, and what were the hardest parts?” A true CTO will have immediate, concrete, and expansive answers that go well beyond just technical stuff.
There’s no shortage of technology executives who are genuinely brilliant at what they do, but have little focus on how technology should be serving the ultimate business objectives. They get excited about architecture and new frameworks. What they should be asking is: “How does this impact revenue results?” or “Does it reduce risk in a way that’s meaningful to the business?” For a non-technical founder, a CTO who cannot translate technology decisions into business outcomes is less like a real executive partner and more like a contractor.
Use the P&L litmus test. One strong sign of business acumen is whether a fractional CTO candidate has had meaningful P&L oversight during their career. P&L responsibility isn’t necessarily difficult, but it’s an important indicator of whether a candidate understands that technology decisions have financial consequences.
The question to ask: “Can you give me an example of how you think about making technology investment decisions when resources are limited?” The answer you want is framed in terms of business outcomes — speed-to-market, customer retention, and fundraising readiness. The order in which they prioritize these tells you a lot.
If you find yourself feeling confused or unable to follow the thread of their answers during the interview, that could be less a reflection of your technical knowledge than a red flag about their communication skills. Which brings us to…
One of the most underrated capabilities of a strong fractional CTO is the ability to make complex technical concepts accessible to non-technical stakeholders — including founders, boards, investors, and leadership teams who need to make decisions without becoming engineers themselves. Many technologists never develop this “translation” skill. They default to jargon, talk in circles, or answer a simple question with a 10-minute explanation of the underlying architecture.
What good looks like: By the end of your first conversation with a strong fractional CTO candidate, you should feel more informed, not more confused. You should be able to describe in plain language at least two or three things you learned about your own technology situation that you didn’t know before. If you leave a conversation thinking “I think they were impressive but I’m not sure what they actually said,” that instinct is telling you something.
The question to ask: “Explain technical debt to me like I’m making a business decision about whether to address it.” Their answer should be a business case, not a technical lecture. Bonus points if they naturally connect it to a risk or opportunity specific to your company.
If your company has VC or PE backing, or if you’re actively pursuing investment, your fractional CTO will almost certainly need to know investor dynamics. They should know how to navigate investor relationships, prepare for technical due diligence, and understand how to position your technology story to people who have seen hundreds of decks and have a very particular set of expectations. This is something that can only be mastered by going through the process multiple times.
M&A experience is also a plus. Even smaller companies in the sub-$25M revenue range are not immune to acquisition activity. A fractional CTO who has been through the buy-side or sell-side diligence process brings a set of skills that are incredibly valuable — and can’t easily be learned on the fly.
The question to ask: “Have you been through a technical due diligence process, either as part of a buying or selling process? What surprised you the most? What were you most and least prepared for?” If the answer to the first question is “no,” that may not necessarily mean disqualification — but it is a gap worth weighing carefully.
This is a question many founders don’t know to ask. By now, “fractional” has become a legitimate career path with real traction in the market. Unfortunately, it has also become a convenient label for smart people between jobs who are picking up gigs while they search for what’s next. The distinction matters a lot:
The accidental fractional. An accidental fractional is typically someone who has strong technical credentials and a good network, but who has never deliberately built a fractional practice. They may have one or two clients right now — probably because the opportunities found them, not because they designed a business around serving multiple clients simultaneously. When the right full-time offer comes along, they’ll wind your engagement down.
The career fractional. A career fractional has made a deliberate choice to operate this way. They have a clear view of how many clients they want to carry at any given time, what their ideal engagement structure looks like, and how they manage the demands of multiple founders simultaneously. They’ve built a support network of trusted vendors, relationships with managed service providers, and access to specialized disciplines when needed. The best ones are part of a bigger fractional organization — which means you’re not just engaging a person; you’re hiring an ecosystem.
The questions to ask: “How long have you been operating as a fractional CTO? How many clients are you currently serving, and what does your ideal client mix look like?” Then: “What does your support network look like? If I needed specialized resources or a development partner, how would you approach that?” A career fractional will have clear, practical answers to both.
A strong fractional CTO candidate will almost always propose some kind of structured discovery or assessment period before locking in a long-term engagement structure. This typically runs two to six weeks and serves two purposes: it gives them time to understand your technology, your business, your team, and your real challenges — and it gives you time to evaluate whether you actually work well together.
Be skeptical of anyone who doesn’t want to assess before committing. If a candidate tells you in your first conversation that you’ll need them at 50% time without having looked under the hood, that’s worth questioning. A good fractional CTO will want to earn the right scope rather than assume it.
The question to ask: “How would you structure the first 30 to 60 days of an engagement with us? What would you expect to learn, and what would you deliver at the end of that period?” Listen for specifics. A career fractional should be able to describe their approach clearly, not in general terms.
This is one of the most practical questions a non-technical founder can ask when you’ve hired someone to manage a function you can’t directly evaluate: “How do you know if they’re delivering?”
Tie it to business outcomes from day one. Before the engagement starts, work with your fractional CTO to define what success looks like in terms you understand and can measure. If the problem was product delivery, what are the milestones? If the problem was technical debt, what does “better” look like in six months? Set these metrics and track them like you track other important KPIs.
Look out for the translation test. One practical ongoing sign of fractional CTO effectiveness is whether they are consistently able to brief you, your board, or your investors in plain language about what’s happening on the technology side of the business. If you’re still feeling like an outsider in those conversations after six months, something’s off.
Use these questions in your interviews. You don’t need to understand the nuances of the technical answers — just listen for clarity, business orientation, and honesty.
Remember, a LinkedIn profile is a starting point, not a decision. For a non-technical founder, it can give you some useful background — but it tells you almost nothing about whether someone can actually lead technology in service of your specific business goals, investors, and growth stage.
This is key: to make a great fractional CTO hire you just need to ask business questions, listen for business answers, and pay attention to how clearly someone can operate in your world, not just theirs.
When you find a career fractional CTO with the breadth of experience, business acumen, and communication skills to operate at your side — and not just get buried inside your tech stack — the impact is immediate. Because they know what you need, and they’ve been there before.
"*" indicates required fields
Get the latest insights from TechCXO’s fractional executives—strategies, trends, and advice to drive smarter growth.