Schedule a 15-Min Call
TechCXO Logo
Schedule a 15-Min Call
  • Functional Roles
        • Functional Roles

        • CFO
        • CSO
        • CRO
        • CMO
        • CTO
        • COO
        • CIO
        • CEO
        • CPO
        • CISO
        • CHRO
        • Project Management
        • Sales Training and Development
        • Recruiter
        • Office of the CFO
  • Finance & Accounting
    • Finance and Accounting Services
      • Accounting Systems
      • Internal Controls
      • Monthly Close
      • Cash Management
      • Financial Reporting
      • Capital Requirements
      • Board Support
    • Financial Strategy
      • Forecast and Modeling
      • Debt and Equity Financing
      • KPIs
    • Transaction Support
      • Due Dilligence
      • M&A
    • Investor & Transaction Services
      • Front-End Due Dilligence
      • Post-Deal Integration and Assimilation
      • Outsourced Operating Partner Capabilities
      • Transaction Assistance
      • Workouts, Turnarounds and Distress
  • Revenue Growth
    • Revenue Operations
      • Metrics
      • Enablement and Training
      • Processes and Methodologies
      • Revenue Tech Stack
      • Messaging Alignment
    • Marketing Strategy and Services
      • Go-to-Market Planning
      • Target Marketing
      • Product-Market Fit
      • Brand Building
      • Demand Generation
      • Performance Marketing
    • Sales Excellence
      • Key Account Management
      • Opportunity Management
      • Partner and Channel Development and Execution
    • Investor & Transaction Services
      • Market and Competitive Review
      • Quality of Programs
      • Forensic Sales Health, Pipeline and Forecast Analytics
  • Product & Technology
    • Technology Leadership
      • Product Development
      • Architecture & DevOps
      • Development Services
      • Emerging Technology
    • Product Strategy
      • Strategic Roadmaps
      • New Product Launch
      • Product Led Growth
      • Product Services
    • IT Services
      • IT Leadership
      • IT Strategy
      • Project & Program Management
    • Information Security
      • Cybersecurity
      • Security & Risk Assesments
      • HIPPA,SOC2,PCI Audit Prep
    • Investor & Transaction Services
      • Technical Due Diligence
      • Sell-Side Tech Assesment
      • Post-Close Integration
      • Ongoing Fractional
  • Strategy & Execution
    • Strategy, Planning and Alignment
      • Mission, Vision and Shared Purpose
      • Corporate Strategy
      • Organization Alignment
      • Operational Excellence
      • Market / Business Assessment
      • Investment Cases
      • Operating Model Design
      • Asset and Behavior Assessment
    • Transformation Execution
      • Operational Model Execution
      • KPIs and Goal Attainment
      • Cross-Functional Initiatives
      • Change Management
      • Digital Transformation
      • Process Improvement
    • Growth Capabilities and Development
      • Go-to-Market Strategy
      • Market Entry and Expansion
      • Strategic Alliances
      • Strategic Negotiations
      • Product & Services Design, Portfolio, Pricing and Management
  • Human Capital
    • HR
      • Policy, Process, Standards and Compliance
      • Employee Relations and Development
      • Compensation and Benefits
    • Organizational Development
      • Culture Building
      • Scale a Business
      • Organizational Structure and Development
      • Performance Management
    • Recruiting
      • Search
      • Project Planning
      • Sourcing
      • Screening
      • Hiring
  • Industries
    • Industries

    • Consumer & Retail
    • Energy & Power
    • Financial Services
    • Healthcare & Life Sciences
    • Industrials
    • Media & Communications
    • Real Estate
    • Technology & Software
    • Business Services
  • About Us
    • About Us

    • History
    • Insights
    • People
    • Contact Us
    • Clients
    • Locations

Fractional Leadership is Hot in 2024… and That’s a Problem

January 24, 2024 by Megan Esposito Leave a Comment

Fractional Leadership is Hot… and that’s a problem

Single-shingle freelancers, staffing firms, and online marketplaces are trying to repackage themselves as Executives on Demand

How to Quickly Evaluate the Quality of Fractional Executive Firms

A business blog recently declared, “The Future is Fractional,” and fractional leadership is “in”. 

Startups and growth companies are embracing the concept of leveraging interim, part-time, and project-based leadership. Companies understand that they can upgrade the experience and talent level of key executives and functions while paying less than the loaded salary of a full-time executive. Better to have a fast-moving superstar as your CFO, CTO, COO, CMO, or CHRO for 10 or 20 hours per week, the thinking goes.

The problem is that with an uncertain business climate in 2024, the market is being flooded with freelancers, single-shingle consultants, staffing firms, struggling life coaches, and unemployed middle managers repackaging themselves as fractional executives. 

Here are four ways to quickly evaluate the quality of the fractional executive you’re considering for your business.

1. Define the “Executive” – A manager, director, or vice president is not a c-suite executive. The experience, decision-making, leadership, and skills of successfully guiding multiple organizations through big strategic decisions are very different than being a middle manager or lower-level executive. Unfortunately, a rash of corporate layoffs is pushing many directors and VP-level employees into the consulting ranks. Dig in on bio pages, LinkedIn profiles, and CVs to evaluate the depth of executive experience being presented.

Consultants are notorious for overstating their abilities. Many consultants at prestigious firms will present themselves as serving in an executive capacity; however, many of these people were plucked off the “MBA farm” without ever working inside companies, let alone leading in a C-suite capacity. TechCXO, for example, requires that every one of its partners has demonstrated success as a C-suite executive at multiple organizations. 

Freelancers who may be fine implementers might also present themselves as executives. While good fractional executives are “doers” and solid execution people, they also understand strategy and how initiatives fit into overall objectives, positioning in a competitive landscape, and support a unique value proposition. If you suspect your resource is a freelancer, ask a series of broad-based questions about customer segments, pricing strategies, and delivery channels. Then, listen closely. 

2. Define “Success” – Executives generally agree that the objective of a business is to eventually sell it. When evaluating a fractional executive, look to see if they were integral to a team that had several successful exits, IPOs, capital raises, and other M&A activities. 

The contributions of marketing, sales, product, tech, and HR people may be a bit harder to quantify than an exit, but seek out hard numbers for product launches, customer/revenue increases, profitability, and ways the entire organization was impacted by an executive’s efforts. 

Client quotes and testimonials are great, but they don’t necessarily communicate the scale of the work provided. Instead, look for true use cases and success stories with some level of complexity that took place over a number of quarters. Try to spot truly transformational work that scaled an organization, turned around a stubborn problem, or opened up new markets. Ask if you can speak directly with those clients, too. 

3. Define the “Team” – Small teams or single-shingle consultants may try to hide the scope of their organizations by not publishing team bios. Be on guard for that on the firm’s website. Some unscrupulous marketplace traders who talk about only 2% of their applicants make the cut, use fake bios to present a false sense of scale. They quite literally reuse photos and bios to present a “team.”

Check bios and the breadth of an organization. A level of scale demonstrates success. You don’t want to get caught in a situation where you are relying on a single company founder or one or two principals. They may be a startup organization themselves and all the dangers of time constraints, inadequate bandwidth, cash flow, or other disruptions.

Search and staffing firms may talk about their extensive “networks,” but they are in the business of plugging one or two resources into a hole. That approach does not constitute a team with a bench. Also, executive search and staffing firms are marketplace-brokered resources (found online) vs. referred, vetted, collaborative partner-quality professionals. Many specialty consulting firms are owned by exec search firms offering fractional and interim work, but do not have cross-discipline teams and resources. That can get expensive and blow up the cost-efficiencies you are anticipating.

For example, you don’t want a CFO-level executive handling your Accounts Receivables and Payables. You’re overpaying for that resource. You want to see a mix of talent at different levels and rates that might include a VP of Finance, Controller, Accounting Managers, and AR/AP coordinators.

Similarly, you wouldn’t want a CTO to be doing all your security, development, coding and project management work or your CHRO to directly do your recruiting and compliance work. A team with a blend of talent and rates is a good indicator of a well-established and high-functioning firm that can provide real-time and cost efficiencies.

4. Look for a Variety of Delivery Models – The classic monthly retainer arrangement or project-based pricing is familiar, but they also show a great deal of limitations. Freelancing, staffing, and firms with limited resources and delivery people are often locked into those models. 

A true executive on-demand firm has greater flexibility. It may discount rates up front for warrants and equity on the back end. It may offer a mentoring and coaching model. It may also offer specific, time-constrained training options. 

In a company’s lifecycle, they may need to push hard on recruiting talent but then may need to pivot to lead generation, sales and growth, or perhaps to raise capital. A multi-discipline executive on-demand firm can provide those resources and shift priorities and spending to the client’s needs. 

Fractional leadership may well be “in” for 2024, but for those firms who have been providing this unique model and approach, it’s been in style for decades.

Filed Under: General

Building a great management team

January 30, 2023 by Megan Esposito Leave a Comment

Oscar Wilde said, “With age comes wisdom.” After working as a CFO for more than 30 years with nearly 100 companies, mostly startups, I’ve begun to identify some of the key early attributes of a topnotch management team. A great management team doesn’t necessarily guarantee success, but without one, you’re almost guaranteed to fail.

Of course, the second part of Wilde’s quote is, “But sometimes age comes alone.” So what are the hallmarks that distinguish a tier-1 management team from others?

The Chief: It starts with the CEO. Experience certainly helps, but there are plenty of outstanding, young CEOs. Successful CEOs rely on their strengths and leverage the strengths of the team around them. In a fundraising pitch, for example, I’ve seen CEOs do nothing more than open and close the meeting. In between, the heads of sales, marketing, product and finance all have a chance to shine and highlights the team.

Hire Great People: I often say that I’ve made a career out of hiring people smarter than I and managing them well. Successful companies and their managers are not afraid to hire A players and they never settle for B players.

Recognition: Great companies highlight and celebrate their successes as a team. “Catch people doing something good”. This might be cash compensation, a call-out at the all-hands company meeting or it could be something with intrinsic value only. At one company, we used a baton to celebrate success. The baton would sit on the recipient’s desk and became a coveted symbol of achievement.

Accountability: Of course, with recognition must come accountability. People need help and coaching if they are not meeting expectations and you can be sure that the rest of the team notices when a teammate is lagging. Holding people accountable for their goals fosters an environment of high achievement and success.

Decision Making: Seek input from a variety of sources but move efficiently to make decisions. Once made, communicate those decisions
clearly and succinctly. Most people are afraid to make decisions, but a leader embraces the challenge and is not afraid to be wrong.

Culture: Perhaps the most important, but the hardest to manage. Culture requires buy-in and starts with the senior management team. Culture is a continuous process that needs to be nurtured. While the management team can help guide the process of building and maintaining a strong culture, they do not have to implement specific programs. There are personality types in every company that help establish company culture. Ask for their advice and allow them to make proposals (e.g. The Fun Committee).

Great management teams operate in an environment of high expectations and welcome candid discussions and feedback. How does your team stack up?

Learn more about Chris Thomajan, TechCXO’s Managing Partner – Boston

Filed Under: General

Remote Knowledge Workers Digital Theater

September 6, 2022 by Megan Esposito Leave a Comment

Remote Knowledge Workers Increasingly Engage in ‘Pretend Work’ Performances

Hours Wasted Daily on Elaborate Electronic Theater to Satiate Guilt Pangs, Traditional Bosses and Clock Watchers

Return to Work Effort May Make “Digital Clown Shows” Worse

For decades movies, tv and comics portrayed the elaborate masquerades created by office cubicle dwellers pretending to look busy in case the boss walked by.  Many were funny and some iconic because of how much truth they held. In one Dilbert comic, the Pointy-Haired Boss declares, “We need a sense of urgency.” Wally, in a moment of honesty, replies: “I spend most of energy pretending to work, but I can add a layer of fake urgency if you really need it.”

Pretending to work is not new.  However, elaborate presentations in what’s being called ‘productivity theater’ among the 20-30 million US-based remote knowledge workers is becoming an all-new art form in the digital world.  The purpose of these online work plays is to give the appearance of constant and conspicuously visible busyness. 

Favorited tactics of digital presenteeism include:

  • intentionally sending emails in the early morning and late evening 
  • remaining logged on Slack at all hours, 
  • blocking out big swaths of time on fake meetings in Google calendar and 
  • joining irrelevant Zoom meetings with the mic muted and the camera off while doing just about anything else outside the call.

Among those who have continued to work significantly or exclusively via remote, its estimated that an average of 67 minutes per day are spent on these performance antics, according to a new report by software companies Catalog and GitLab. 

Post Labor Day 2022, companies like Apple, Comcast, Prudential Financial and Peloton are nudging employees to return to work, if not completely than at least a couple of days per week. The Wall Street Journal called Labor Day a “line in the corporate sand” which is “the best chance to finally lean on workers to return to the office this year.”

“Pretend to Work Somewhere Else”

 Some companies are shoving rather than nudging. Recently, Elon Musk told employees in a memo they are expected to return to work or “pretend to work somewhere else.” His memo subject was “Remote work is no longer acceptable,”and he wrote, “anyone who wishes to do remote work must be in the office for a minimum (and I mean *minimum*) of 40 hours per week or depart Tesla. This is less than we ask of factory workers.”

Is Work from Home More Productive?

Mr. Musk may have been operating from the old school perspective that working remotely from home is a way to loaf without being seen.

However, a study published in Nature looked at data from 60,000 Microsoft employees and found remote workers were actually more productive for short-term projects. The study did point out those same employees did not perform as well for longer-term projects. A potential cause for that dynamic may be the lack of team interaction and collaboration. 

Also, over time, distractions from family members to pets and errands may become more prevalent for those not accustomed to remote work.

Factory Mentality and Guilt Pangs

For their part, workers say they do feel pangs of guilt if they deviate from a 9-5 routine or take breaks from work with a walk, attending to personal business or just daydreaming.   To compensate for the insecurity that comes with working from home in casual dress, elaborate performances of appearing constantly busy ensue.

These feelings of insecurity or guilt stem from a factory mentality prevalent in the 1980s, according to Cal Newport, who wrote the best-seller Deep Work. The factory mentality attempts to achieve high production by constantly applying effort to a mechanical system, like an assembly line. A plurality of workers say they believe management and company leadership prefer a traditional in-office culture with lots of activity buzzing about.

Many knowledge workers are pushing back. They have come to enjoy benefits of work-at-home, including more work-life balance and quality time with family, and less commuting stress and wasted time.  Apple has again asked employees to return three days per week.  Some of the company’s employees have gone so far to form Slack channels of advocacy groups. Among the largest at Apple with as many as 2,800 members called “Apple Together”  are pushing back against return-to-office plans.

Solutions based in Remote Work Veterans

TechCXO, which provides on-demand executives and teams to companies of all sizes, has been leveraging remote and hybrid work models since its founding in 2003. Their interim and fractional executives  include CFOs, CTOs, CMOs, Heads of Sales, COOs and HR Executives.  These executives on demand are expert and building hybrid teams and delivery models that work for organizations who want flexibility for employees but also want projects and initiatives driven to completion. 

Project Management experts at the firm are frequently incorporated into complex product and IT deliveries that efficiently combine in-person and remote task deliveries and thus eliminating the need for pretend remote performances.  

Source: Microsoft

Filed Under: General

Some Consulting Starting Salaries Reach 100k

March 30, 2022 by Megan Esposito

Far be it from us to criticize talented people earning significant compensation. However, we were a little taken back when we read a Wall Street Journal article “Behold, the New Starting Salary for Some Graduates Is $100,000 (March 10, 2022)” detailing how some college seniors were walking from the diploma ceremony into a six-figure starting salary in consulting firms.

Big Salaries for Investment Banking and Tech, Yes, But Consulting?

Wage inflation is real in a tight labor market. Investment banking always draws big bucks and tech firms are getting more aggressive in their courting of talent, particularly for emerging platforms in fintech and cryptocurrency.

Also, as the IPO market has cooled a bit with its most sluggish start in six years, employees who hoped for a future windfall may be looking for more upfront money. But it was this paragraph in WSJ that got us going:

McKinsey & Co. and Boston Consulting Group also bumped their bases to a new floor of $100,000, according to My Consulting Offer, which tracks the sector’s salaries. Rookies at Bain & Co. can expect to make six figures, too, says Keith Bevans, Bain’s global head of recruiting.

The age of the average TechCXO partner and staff skews a bit older in large part due to our value proposition that when you get a fractional or interim TechCXO executive, they have sat in a c-suite chair already. Maybe we’re just a bit resentful of the younger set, but we’ll get over it.

Filed Under: General

TechCXO Philadelphia

August 18, 2021 by Megan Esposito

TechCXO Opens Philadelphia Office

Executives On Demand Firm Led Locally by Jim Corr and John Capobianco

TechCXO®, a pioneer and leading provider of industry-relevant, part-time, fractional and interim executives and teams, today announced that it is establishing a Philadelphia presence led by veteran finance executive Jim Corr and growth and operations expert John Capobianco.

TechCXO was recently named to the Inc. 5000 list of the nation’s fastest-growing private companies for the 13th straight year. (View Press Release)

TechCXO was founded in 2003 on the premise that companies can benefit from having the best executive talent available and serving as their CFOs, CEOs, COOs, CMOs, CROs, CSOs, CTOs and other executives on a part-time, interim or fractional basis. Companies can also outsource entire functions to TechCXO, including Finance & Accounting, Operations, HR and Sales and Marketing. TechCXO also provides executive and team coaching support.

Thousands of startup and growth-stage companies have called on TechCXO due to its unique, cost-effective model that enables ready access to top talent without high costs, mandatory long-term commitments or lack of availability.

“Philadelphia is a key market for our expansion plans, and with Jim and John, we have the right people to lead our efforts here,” said Kent Elmer, TechCXO’s Managing Partner. “Not only are they distinguished and effective executives and advisors, they are both terrific networkers focused on building an ecosystem of entrepreneurs, investors and valued service providers.”

“Philadelphia’s entrepreneurial energy is exceptional. The increase in startup investments has been significant, and there is a fast-growing emphasis on innovation in regional industry strengths like fintech, health care and biotech,” said Jim Corr. “In TechCXO, we have a peer network of incredible executives who have successfully led companies as their CEO, COO, CFO, CRO, CTO and other executive roles. The firm’s track record of growth and success is phenomenal. We are ready to begin growing in Philly immediately.”

“There are so many built-in advantages for Philadelphia as a tech hub. There is a robust Incubator, Angel, Venture Capital, and Private Equity Investor network. Then, there’s a world-class education infrastructure of colleges and universities. Rents and housing are relatively low-cost. Young, creative people who come to school here are staying here for the lifestyle,” said John Capobianco. “Couple all that with a culture of hard-work, hustle and grit and you have something special here.”

About TechCXO

TechCXO is a pioneer in providing high potential companies across the country with industry-relevant interim, part-time and fractional executives on-demand. More than 3,000 companies, from startups to the Global 1000, have entrusted TechCXO to help with their critical functions by calling on TechCXO executives as their CFOs, CEOs, COOs, CSO, CTOs, CMOs, CHROs and other executive roles. TechCXO’s major practice areas are: Finance & Accounting, Product & Technology, Revenue Growth, Human Capital and Executive Operations. TechCXO has appeared on the Inc. 500/5000 Fastest Growing Private list every year since 2008. For more information about the firm, please visit https://www.techcxo.com.

Filed Under: General

TechCXO Names Nicole Siokis as Chief Operating Officer

October 30, 2020 by Megan Esposito

TechCXO is pleased to announce that it has named veteran executive Nicole Siokis as Partner, Chief Operating Officer. Ms. Siokis will help guide the firm’s continued nationwide growth and international expansion.

Nicole joined TechCXO in February 2018 and has been focused on organizational structure, internal business process review, and firm profitability. In her new role, she will focus on firm growth by practice area and geography, firm profitability and new strategic initiatives.

Nicole, a US Army combat veteran, previously served as President & Owner of the Atlanta branch for a national strategic workforce solutions firm. She was also an Associate Partner for a well-known executive search firm where she was responsible for strategic partnerships with senior business and HR leaders. In addition, she worked for a major telecommunications company based in Atlanta where she served as Director for Small Business Marketing, as well as Director for Domestic and International Carrier Relations. She is a graduate of Clemson University. (read Nicole Siokis’ full bio).

“Nicole is a very skilled operational executive. She’s highly organized, understands how to motivate and mobilize talented people, while maintaining focus on growth and profitability,” said TechCXO Managing Partner and Co-Founder Kent Elmer. “She’s the perfect combination of skills for what TechCXO needs going forward.”

“We’re entering a new era of expansion and broader services, and Nicole is one of the people we’re relying on to help guide us. It is a pleasure to have her overseeing many of our critical operations,” added TechCXO Co-Founder Mike Casey.

You can read the full press release here

Filed Under: General Tagged With: News

TechCXO Client MemberSuite Raises $11M Series B

October 30, 2020 by Megan Esposito

TechCXO client MemberSuite raised $11 million of Series B venture funding from lead investor Revolution Ventures on September 26, 2016.   Fidelis Partners, Angel Investment Management, Accomplice Partners and Alerion Ventures also participated.

The company plans to use the funding to add over 50 team members, with a focus on hiring in sales, marketing and engineering in the Atlanta region. With the round, the company has now raised a total of $19.6 million in funding to date.

MemberSuite is a provider of association management software (AMS) for associations and nonprofit organizations. The company develops software that helps trade associations manage fundraising, event planning, accounting, dues-collection and other functions.   It delivers its web-based, back-office software on a subscription basis.  TechCXO partner Todd Guthrie is engaged with MemberSuite.  Read the full release here.

 

Filed Under: General Tagged With: News, Raising Capital

QuikOrder Acquired by Pizza Hut

October 30, 2020 by Megan Esposito

Congratulations to our client, QuikOrder, for being acquired by Pizza Hut. TechCXO supported QuikOrder with finance and accounting services for close to two years, including M&A support by assisting in due diligence pre-sale and interim CFO services from TechCXO’s Bob Brogan.

QuikOrder, is Chicago-based and a leading online ordering software and service provider for the restaurant industry. Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but it marks one of Pizza Hut’s largest acquisitions to date.

By acquiring QuikOrder’s online ordering capabilities, Pizza Hut U.S. will improve its ability to deliver an easy and personalized online ordering experience and accelerate digital innovation across its base of more than 6,000 restaurants in the U.S. In 2018, approximately half of Pizza Hut U.S. sales were processed through QuikOrder’s platform. Founded in 1997, QuikOrder specializes in developing and maintaining internet-ordering systems used across the QSR industry. It has served Pizza Hut U.S. for nearly two decades. Over that time, it has built an expert team that fully understands and meets Pizza Hut’s specific needs. The acquisition will include: Pizza Hut’s current digital ordering platforms, systems and services and QuikOrder’s in-restaurant technology and ancillary services, as well as its future generation products and programming.

Read more:

Chicago Sun Times
Chicago Business
PRNewswire

 


techcxo-10-time-fastest-growing
Bob Brogan is a senior Strategy, Operations & Finance executive recognized for identifying and delivering profit-improvement objectives for software as a service, professional services and technology companies.
bob.brogan@techcxo.com
(708) 243-7004
See Bob’s full bio

 

Filed Under: General Tagged With: CFO, Mergers and Acquisitions, News

Peter Biro – Why choose TechCXO?

October 29, 2020 by Megan Esposito Leave a Comment

Why would an accomplished entrepreneur, CFO, Stanford MBA with an engineering degree from Duke choose the TechCXO on-demand executive model for his career? We asked him (Peter Biro).

Peter Biro is an experienced operating and financial executive and entrepreneur with deep experience in enterprises from pre-revenue to $100M. Peter is focused on early-stage infrastructure, software and SaaS businesses in need of assistance in fundraising and transaction execution, scaling their finance and sales operations processes functions, and taking their businesses global.

He specializes in financial transactions, from financings to M&A to optimizing economics of different sales channels, for companies up to $50M in revenue.  He also specializes in assisting Israeli-based technology companies.

He has served in a variety of operating roles in technology companies:

  • CFO of ObserveIT – An Israeli security software company backed by Bain Capital Ventures.
  • VP of Business Development of syndicated data provider Restaurant Sciences (merged with GuestMetrics).
  • COO of of Lyris, Inc. (acquired by Aurea) – A publicly-traded digital marketing software, which he helped create through a number of complementary acquisitions.
  • Co-founder of Five Guys Burgers and Fries – The Northeast’s largest franchise group.
  • Entrepreneur in Residence – General Catalyst Partners. Peter vetted transactions and helped launch Icelandicdata center company, Verne Global.
  • Founder of The Cowper Group – A management consultancy focused on buy-side M&A for middle market technology companies

He began his career in IT on Wall Street.  Peter holds a BSEE from Duke University and an MBA from Stanford.

Filed Under: General Tagged With: CFO, News

Robotic Automation Leader and TechCXO Client Soft Robotics Raises $20M

October 29, 2020 by Megan Esposito

Soft Robotics’ proprietary materials and machines are doing incredible things for food, beverage and advanced manufacturing industries. The company’s innovation allows a robot to grasp and manipulate items of varying size, shape and weight, including a tomato, bagel (see images) and even cupcakes. TechCXO is proud to have assisted Soft Robotics’ capital raise of $20M in an oversubscribed funding round.  Boston-based TechCXO Partner Peter Biro has been assisting Soft Robotics in accounting and finance functions, as well as advising the company on its capital raise.

The following is from Soft Robotics’ press release:

CAMBRIDGE, Mass., May 2, 2018 /PRNewswire/ — Award-winning industrial robotics company Soft Robotics announced today that it has raised $20M in an oversubscribed funding round. The new investors include Scale Venture Partners, Calibrate Ventures, Honeywell Ventures, Tekfen Ventures, Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd., with Hyperplane Venture Capitalleading the round. Existing investors include Material Impact, ABB Technology Ventures, Taylor Farms Ventures and Haiyin Capital. Joining the Board of Directors will be Rory O’Driscoll from Scale Venture Partners and Kevin Dunlap from Calibrate Ventures.

Soft Robotics unlocks robotic automation for large, meaningful markets and labor starved industries such as food and beverage, advanced

Soft Robotics’ machines can grasp delicate items

manufacturing and e-commerce. Leveraging patented material science and AI algorithms, Soft Robotics designs and builds automation solutions and soft robotic gripping systems that can grasp and manipulate items with the same dexterity of the human hand. Since the company’s inception, its technology platform has experienced substantial customer validation and adoption, with over 80% year over year revenue growth and production installations running 24/7 for Fortune 500 companies and Dow 30 components, including Just Born Quality Confections (maker of Peeps).

“We’re proud of the team’s work to date to scale up the Soft Robotics’ technology platform and gain significant commercial traction across our customer verticals, said Soft Robotics CEO Carl Vause. “We’ve been able to address some of our customers’ largest supply chain and automation challenges, from picking and packing fresh produce and raw proteins, to bin picking and retail order fulfillment.”

ABB, a leader in robotics and industrial automation, sees the investment in Soft Robotics as part of ABB’s overall strategy to shape the future of industrial digitalization and the automated warehouse.

“We saw early on that the Soft Robotics solution is a paradigm shift in the way our machines interact with their environment, especially in their ability to grasp deformable, delicate, binned or otherwise complex items,” said Grant Allen, Head of Ventures at ABB Group. “As a leader in industrial manipulation with over 300,000 robots deployed, ABB sees a huge number of amplifying automation solutions but the intuitive control software Soft Robotics has created combined with their agile gripper is a linchpin of the automated warehouse.  In an era of increasingly high mix, low volume production cycles coupled with the need for pain-free automation configurability, we are also extremely excited about the direction Soft Robotics is taking their core technology with SuperPick, allowing ABB arms to do more with less training, greater accuracy and increasing autonomy.”

Soft RoboticsThis funding round comes at a pivotal time in Soft Robotics’ growth. Having proven the economic benefit and scalability of the technology, the company is today at a critical moment of accelerating its commercial penetration plans and new product roadmap.

“As investors we aim to match innovative technologies with major, unmet market needs,” said Rory O’Driscoll, Partner at Scale Venture Partners. “The $40B industrial automation market is large and growing, but largely limited to industries like automotive and semiconductor. Existing rigid robotic technology just doesn’t work for industries such as food and beverage or e-commerce, because of the variability of the product and the unstructured nature of the environment. With so many industries facing mounting pressure to automate, we aren’t surprised that there has been such rapid adoption of Soft Robotics’ technology.”

For more information about Soft Robotics, please visit www.softroboticsinc.com.

About Soft Robotics

Soft Robotics designs and builds soft robotic automation systems that can grasp and manipulate items of varying size, shape and weight. Spun out of the Whitesides Group at Harvard University, Soft Robotics is the only company to be commercializing this groundbreaking and proprietary technology platform. Today, the company is a global enterprise solving previously off-limits automation challenges for customers in food & beverage, advanced manufacturing and e-commerce. Soft Robotics’ engineers are building an ecosystem of robots, control systems, data and machine learning to enable the workplace of the future.

Contact:
Elyse Winer
Company Representative
Phone: (617) 645-5183
ewiner@softroboticsinc.com
www.softroboticsinc.com

Additional News Stories

Cambridge-based Soft Robotics to hire, move HQ following $20M raise

Soft Robotics raises $20 million to expand operations

 

Filed Under: General Tagged With: News, Raising Capital

ESG Investing

October 29, 2020 by Megan Esposito Leave a Comment

The Rise of the Single Company ESG Rating

The Good. The Bad. And Where We (Might) Go From Here

There is no longer any doubt that ESG investing is a major force with estimates now exceeding $20 trillion.  The days of negative screening, excluding “sin stocks” or oil and gas companies, are long past. ESG Integration is now a major focus of Wall Street and with it real progress and some warranted skepticism.

“The Remarkable Rise of ESG” a short piece by George Kell, Forbes, July 11, 2018, does an excellent job of walking through the early days of SRI and how far we have come. More recently “How Socially Responsible Investing Lost It’s Soul” by Rachel Evans, Bloomberg BusinessWeek, December 18, 2018, suggests a wake up call, warning that Wall Street is now, as is predictable, churning out ESG product that will disappoint the likely naïve but well intentioned.  Taking just one aspect of where we are today, the single company ESG rating, this can be used to check our current position on the evolution of ESG investing and help us to project where we are likely headed from here.

As an active participant in risk and quantitative investment analytics the rise of ESG and SRI factors, research and investing has thus far been a captivating journey. With the single company rating it is hard not to be drawn into reflecting back on the headline use of VaR (value at risk) as “the best single measure of risk” (before 2008 that is).  While practitioners knew a single risk measure was not a full answer to any question there was not a lot of effort made to broadly educate and communicate on the known limitations. Vendors pushed their system’s ability to produce a VaR measure, increasing emphasis on a single number as a panacea for a very complex reality. To be fair, with ESG ratings we are not looking at a huge underestimation of potential losses but I think there are some helpful parallels.

There has been a lot written on “the inconsistency” of ESG ratings and how the approach taken by vendor supplied ESG analysis can vary and just how wide the results can be between ratings agencies. CRSHub did a study in 2018 where correlation between company level ESG ratings between two leading vendors was only 0.32 (pretty low vs. 0.90 in their example for Credit Ratings).  These statistics will not surprise practitioners but as in the VaR example this did surprise the majority of investors who had less knowledge/exposure (prior to 2008/9).

Keeping it simple let’s start with positives and potential negatives about a single ESG rating.

The Good

A single score drives more widespread access to ESG analysis, investment decisions for many (retail investors/ wealth management), and revenue growth for most direct participants.  The rising use of the single company ESG score and its use in portfolio or index scores and index creation is telling.  The two largest ESG ratings agencies, MSCI ESG and Sustainalytics are leading and benefiting.  In summary what’s driving the focus on single company ratings comes down to first, “follow the money” but also the fact that – it is the practical first choice today for over 80% of users.

  • Allows more investments and investment decisions to be powered, or partially powered by ESG ratings. Supports creating and marketing products that can be successful with broad audiences.
  • A top-level score is a great first step in a screening process, to bring in names or weed some out. Similarly for monitoring changes. This provides a much improved and sophisticated approach rather than for example screening out by industry (Oil and Gas, Tobacco as an examples).
  • People want easy answers, not lots of data and questions. Looking at individual factors ratings within say the Governance category might just lead to confusion. People struggle when sifting through too much data. So even if a company level ESG rating may be inconsistent with that from another “credible source”, or important underlying factors might be showing specific high risk, the need for an answer wins.
  • Pick your poison – This allows for balance of where companies are doing well and avoids penalizing too much for maybe what hits headlines or could be present in specific underlying ratings or factors.
  • It reduces even bigger inconsistencies potentially in the underlying discrete measures/ factors. The rolled up rating will reduce that noise. Smoothing out the bumps that may annoy or distract people is not a bad thing.
  • Mutes out, at least to a degree, specific known unresolved biases. There are well-documented issues that show problems with ratings related to size, geography, and industry.
  • It gets people using and paying for research/ ratings in general (because they will only use at this level). Creating more revenue for the ratings industry will increase the quality and consistency of the underlying analysis over time. More people looking at top line data drives usage down in the detail by the heavy analytical users.

The Bad

Too much focus on the single rating could lead companies to solely manage to that number/rating. A single rating could hide important information. Instead of bringing more focus to critical issues, the merged score could potentially turn the spotlight off.  If the top-level score ends up being all-important then that is where the focus will be, and taking pressure off specific issues that are impactful (within individual E, S & G topics/ areas).

  • External pressure on companies to address specific shortcomings could actually be reduced. Emphasis on a single topline number/ rating could reduce pressure on companies who are rated low in specific areas – except in the most extreme cases. This gives them the ability to say – “But overall we are doing well, we have to look at the full picture, which we do and …”.
  • Internal resource and financial commitments to address specific shortcomings could be reduced if just the overall rating is what gets attention. The details become less important. Manage to the top-line number.
  • If all incentives are connected to a top-line rating then all actions will be as well. Incentive examples, inclusion in an index, a portfolio, how a company is compared to another for factor/ quantitative inclusion/selection or just an individual comparing two stocks…
    • Investment Managers who had been conducting their own research have often found that their funds don’t score as well as they would expect when scored by ratings firms. AUM could flow away and direct research conducted in-house (away from ratings firms) could be reduced.
    • Investment managers and ESG branded firms that rely on single external ratings could see the lion’s share of AUM growth.
  • Further consolidation and reduction of firms doing ESG research. Specialized “best of breed” ratings firms that only focus on specific issues such as for carbon impacts (within E) would need to partner or be acquired to be a part of producing a single rating. With the importance and value of their research reduced, the overall quality/depth of ESG research available in the market may diminish.
  • Reduces pressure on Ratings firms to increase the quality of their individual factor ratings. Single score can be disconnected, backward looking but more easily momentum building (self fulfilling outperformance).
  • There has been criticism in the credit world of conflicts of interest between the issuer and rating agency. The focus on the single rating could increase the potential of this also leading to conflicts in ESG.
  • Could increase breadth over depth of coverage, presenting a disincentive for providers to increase the depth of research (analysis within categories) and just focus on covering more names.
  • Delays the replacement of overly subjective methodologies not maturing into more structured objective transparent approaches. With less scrutiny on the underlying methodology, the improvement of individual underlying factor scores will be slower.

Looking Ahead

We can expect that the single rating will persist. It’s easy, handy and approachable. It is no doubt a vast improvement over negative screening for example based solely on industry. If as investors and information consumers we are interested but do not want to have to get into the detail, for now this could be just right. Maybe we will see more conversation about the use of single scores for the E, the S, and the G.  Some will argue that the Governance rating should always be on its own and that Social and Environmental have more standing as a combo.

Increasing interest in investment decisions and allocations to ESG Investments will allow for more options and choices, both around what analysis and ratings are produced and what investment opportunities are made available.  The analytics and the investment opportunities don’t have to be totally in sync but it’s best when the mutual support is there and when the two have separation without conflicts.  The rise of the single rating is strategically working for the largest ratings firms, with asset managers creating and marketing new products (ESG boutique firms), and with wealth management and the brokerage industry needing to keep it simple.

The fact that we are seeing criticism (the BusinessWeek article noted above as an example) is a plus.  We can demand and expect continued evolution in how ESG ratings are produced and leveraged.  The current scale and expected growth and inclusion of ESG factors and ratings in investment decision making will push through the current shortcomings that the overuse of the single ESG rating may present.   The investment approaches and ESG products produced and sold today will doubtless be replaced by more sophisticated offerings that are backed up by higher quality data and longer histories as the ratings evolution continues.


Filed Under: General Tagged With: Account Based Marketing and Sales, News

Andersen Alumni TechCXO

October 25, 2020 by Megan Esposito

The Andersen Alumni Association recently featured TechCXO and its co-founders, Kent Elmer and Mike Casey The article includes the backstory of the founding of TechCXO, including its first days at TechCFO, how the spirit of Andersen lives on within the firm, the success TechCXO is enjoying today.  The full story follows.  You can also read the story on the Andersen Alumni website or download a PDF.

Entrepreneurial Spirit: TechCXO, Pioneers in the On-Demand Economy

Six in 10 Americans recently told a Harris Poll that professional control of where, when, why, how and with whom one works is the new version of the “American Dream.”

But back in the early 2000s, in the aftermath of the internet bubble, Andersen alumni Mike Casey and Kent Elmer weren’t thinking about creating dreams; they were thinking about making a living.

From the Dot Bomb Rubble

Casey, who worked with Andersen Enterprise Group from 1985-1991 was winding down iXL, one of Atlanta’s most high-profile dot-bombs, as its CFO. Elmer had been with Andersen Enterprise Group from 1990-1993 and had just moved back from California after joining Broadcom’s M&A team through the acquisition of the early-state company of which he was the CFO. They both had successful stints as CFOs but re-entering public accounting or joining another public company held limited appeal. They both enjoyed the buzz and promise of early-stage companies.

“I was delivering outsourced fractional and project CFO and accounting services to a number of early stage and established technology companies as I looked for another full-time assignment.   Mike’s company, Mapics, was one of my clients, “ said Kent Elmer. “The more we talked, the more I realized that Mike already had a vision for the business model that I was executing – he even had the named already picked out. He convinced me that this could be more than just an interim gig while I looked for my next job – it was my job and career!”

TechCFO is Born

TechCFO was born. The premise was to present high potential companies with proven CFOs and support in an interim or fractional model. A few years after taking the plunge, the fledgling firm added more Andersen alumni, including Casey and Rick Lynch.

Those early TechCFO partners traded on their professional reputations to secure clients. Early on, clients warmed more slowly to the model, and then became fans as partners delivered service that exceeded expectations. An ecosystem of VCs, attorneys, bankers and even regional accounting firms was starting to build. The informal collection would network and refer to one another promising early-stage companies who needed guidance. The model was taking hold.

The Spirit of Andersen Lives On

Expansion followed into Boston and then Raleigh-Durham. Clients then began asking for other services, including sales, marketing and technology. The firm brought in sales executive Rick Nichols, who had ties with Andersen, launching the SOAR global account strategy and planning initiative. Nichols was drawn to the spirit and quality of the firm, which felt Andersen-like in many ways.

The company rebranded as TechCXO in 2012, and added a complement of interim and fractional COOs, CTOs, CROs, CSO and CMOs to its ranks.

Today, it is highly likely that a successful startup in Atlanta or the Southeast has the fingerprints of a TechCXO partner somewhere in their corporate profile. The Boston office has become a mainstay within the biotech and medical device startup communities, and the New York, Nashville and Midwest offices are growing quickly. TechCXO has roughly 85 partners and another 50 staff.

The firm recently celebrated its 15th year in business and has been named a 10-time Honoree of INC’s Fastest Growing Private Companies in America. The firm estimates it has assisted more than 1,000 clients and assisted on more than $5B of transactions, including M&A and capital raises.

Kent Elmer says the appeal is straightforward.

“We’re lean and flat. Because we rely on our partners’ networks to generate business, partners retain 80- 90%-plus of what they bill (see the TechCXO Prospective Partner Guide. They get to choose the clients they work with, and there’s a very strong entrepreneurial vibe in the firm, even though we’re a collection of mostly 50-plus-year-olds,” Elmer said. “We’re a casual and collegial group, too. Lots of cross-marketing takes place, and we really put our shoulder behind new partners.”

The No (Jerks) Rule

Internally, a well-worn proclamation is Rule #1: The No (Jerks) Rule. The plan for the future is simple: more partners in more markets. The firm says it’s generating more than $25 million annually.

“Every quarterly meeting, we show the same growth metrics. We didn’t start this thing to be a gig economy pioneer – it just kind of evolved into that. We’re getting to the point now where we need some more processes and infrastructure, but the basics are the same: partners are the product,” Elmer said. “Companies are getting an executive or team with no learning curve who can impact their business positively very quickly and for a fraction of the cost of a full-time department.”

Right for Andersen Alumni?

And would TechCXO appeal to Andersen alumni?

“Absolutely,” says Mike Casey. “If you’re a buyer, you’ll recognize the quality and rigor. If you’ve got some gray hair, have a strong entrepreneurial strain in your DNA, and enjoy business development, while being connected to great peers, TechCXO is a great later-stage career choice.”

Filed Under: General Tagged With: News

Wurk Secures $11 Million in Funding to Facilitate Further Expansion and Support the Growing Cannabis Workforce

October 24, 2020 by Megan Esposito

Leading cannabis Human Capital Management company plans to utilize this capital to bring in-demand technology and services to the market while investing in customer experience

Wurk, the first and leading Human Capital Management company for the cannabis industry, is pleased to announce the raise of $11 million in a funding round led by returning investors Poseidon Asset Management and Arcadian Fund. Existing investors Altitude, Salveo Capital, Phyto Partners and The Arcview Group also participated in the round.

Wurk plans to utilize the capital to enhance the client experience while expanding its cannabis HCM platform, including the launch of managed services. This will provide its growing customer base with dedicated human resource, payroll and tax experts. The company will also implement a robust analytics engine to provide highly sought-after data for the cannabis industry, allowing employers to increase operating efficiencies by benchmarking themselves against industry best practices.

“Our technology ecosystem allows cannabis companies to recruit, retain and optimize the efficiency of their rapidly growing workforces,” said Keegan Peterson, Founder and CEO of Wurk. “Multiple new states came online in 2018, and with a number of markets planning to implement a regulated cannabis program this year, the industry needs these critical business applications in place to support it at scale.”

“After participating in Wurk’s previous two funding rounds, we are thrilled to have the opportunity to invest in the company yet again,” said Emily Paxhia, Managing Partner at Poseidon Asset Management. “As investors focused on the cannabis space, we regularly see the HR, accounting, and tax challenges that startups in the industry face on a frequent basis. Wurk’s solution helps ease that massive compliance burden and creates a huge investment opportunity in doing so.”

TechCXO Managing Partner Rick Nichols is supporting Wurk as COO and Board Member.

Wurk helps cannabis companies manage payroll, human resources, timekeeping, scheduling and tax compliance, and minimizes compliance risks in the ever-changing cannabis regulatory environment. The company uses its expertise and trusted partnerships to provide guidance on 280E tax law, accounting and banking. Its platform is designed to scale nationally with the growth of the industry, while incorporating the local laws and regulations unique to individual states.

About Wurk

Wurk exists to help underserved businesses fortify, comply, and thrive in the face of uncertain regulatory environments. Designed specifically for the cannabis industry, our platform and managed services, allows employers to protect and streamline their operations, while providing an environment where people are a priority every step of the way. The intuitive solution automates the most complicated and risk-prone processes associated with Human Resources. For more information visit enjoywurk.com.

SOURCE Wurk

Related Links

http://enjoywurk.com

Filed Under: General Tagged With: News, Raising Capital

Negotiating Price

October 24, 2020 by Megan Esposito

When it comes to negotiating a price in mergers and acquisitions, there are, of course, two very different perspectives: those of the buyers and those of the sellers.

The buyer wants upside, efficiencies, strategic fit and certain parameters met. The seller wants fair value (or maybe a little more than fair value) for their company. Effective negotiators get deals done by bridging the two perspectives. Below are some useful maxims for the respective sides.

The buyer wants upside, efficiencies, strategic fit and certain parameters met. The seller wants fair value (or maybe a little more than fair value) for their company. Effective negotiators get deals done by bridging the two perspectives. Below are some useful maxims for the respective sides.

Sellers

Valuation. What’s my company worth? There are many variables to valuation but you can get in a reasonable range to begin negotiations with the right information. First, there are comparables in your industry. If your firm is private, look at market capitalization and ratios for similarly-sized and positioned companies that are publicly traded.  NOTE: There is a discounted valuation for private companies versus public companies. In the past, public companies were worth significantly more — the valuation gap ranged from 30-50% plus. That dynamic has changed, but it is important to note that a private company discount still exists.
Along with public company valuations, you can also research M&A and other transactions in your sector for similarly-sized companies. Another standard and popular gauge is the historical revenue per employee calculation.

Strategic Assets + Future Value – We’ve talked before about the importance of the Seller’s Story. Specifically, negotiate a price based on the value your company brings to the acquirer; determine how you can accelerate their growth and/or enhance their value, then negotiate off that prospect. That means highlighting strengths be they geographic, unique market niches, key customers, market dominance, service abilities and more.

Buyer’s Disclosure – We often think of disclosure from the seller’s side, but there is also a buyer’s disclosure that can help the seller’s valuation. Buyers use a logical process for acquisition targets and pull together for their investment banker or consultant marching orders to find companies in a certain space or market sector with the specific attributes. The company will have obtained Board approval to seek companies with these attributes. Ask investment bankers callers what these attributes are – you might even ask for a document the I-bankers have prepared for their client. Do this right at the initial stages of inquiry and then build your story along these sought attributes.

Pay Only for Strategic Fit. Avoid price discussions until you thoroughly understand the acquiree’s business; put you best people on the project team until you validate the strategic value proposition and only pay for that. Remember: No amount of back office rationalization or tax benefits can justify an acquisition; the value always comes from expanding and penetrating new markets.

Buyers

Price: Keep it Simple. Adhere to the KISS rule of simplicity when establishing a price range / multiple for acquisitions price. Keep the variables few and simple. This will increase the likelihood that both parties are focused on the good of the combined entity post closing.

Room for Growth. Set a price with room to grow the multiple in order to make the purchase “accretive” to your company’s value. If the acquiring company is valued at say 10 times net income, the target price of the acquisition should be less than or equal to 10 times earnings. That way the acquisition itself helps increase the value of the acquiring company. Acquiring for more than your valuation will result in negative value to the purchaser. Also, price represents perceived value which should represent the ability to disrupt a new market with new advantages; base pricing on the asymmetrical competitive advantages.

Demand (from yourself) a Post-Deal Plan. Due diligence is not complete until a 6 to 12 month post deal plan is in place. Without it, you don’t really understand strategic fit and can’t justify the deal. Post deal plan should center on quick market wins demonstrating new strategy.

Keep Savings for Yourself. Cost savings through shared assets, like software and licenses; shared services like accounting, legal, HR and marketing; and share operations, such as facilities, belong to the buyer and should not be part of the price negotiation. There is always risk in not achieving the savings.

Filed Under: General Tagged With: CFO, Mergers and Acquisitions, Transaction Readiness

Female Founded Startups

October 24, 2020 by Megan Esposito

TechCXO continued its leadership in assisting female founded startups

TechCXO is dedicated to supporting female founded startups as they set a foundation for success by building best practices and infrastructure; access capital, customers and ecosystems; and accelerate revenue, product and market expansion.  Startups do this through a variety of TechCXO services, including Finance & Operations support from our CFOs; Sales & Marketing support from CSOs and CMOs; and Product & Technology support from CTOs and CIOs.

According to Crunchbase News, 2018 set at an all-time high for investment dollars into female-founded tech companies. In 2018, $38.9 billion was invested in companies with a female founder, representing 17 percent of venture dollars funded globally. Investments in 2018 came close to doubling the amount recorded in 2017, a year that saw $19.8 billion invested into companies with at least one female founder.

The following is a partial list of female founded startups we’ve assisted, the industry and cities in which they operate, who the TechCXO partners are who have, or are, supporting them and any additional notes on the companies’ success.

Filed Under: General Tagged With: News

TechCXO Logo-Reversed
About TechCXO

People
Clients
Contact & Locations
News

Executive Focus

Finance
Revenue Growth
Product & Technology
Human Capital
Executive Ops

TechCXO HQ

3423 Piedmont Rd., NE
Atlanta, GA 30305

LinkedIn Facebook X

Copyright 2025 TechCXO
Privacy Policy | Accessibility